<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Provocative Microphone of the Christian Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=podcast" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts</link>
	<description>The Official Podcast of RealApologetics.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.5.3" -->
	<copyright>Copyright ©  2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>realapologetics@gmail.com (Jamin Hubner)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>realapologetics@gmail.com (Jamin Hubner)</webMaster>
	<category>posts</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	<itunes:subtitle>The Official Podcast of RealApologetics.org.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The Official Podcast of RealApologetics.org</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>apologetics, Christianity</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality" />
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture">
		<itunes:category text="Philosophy" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Jamin Hubner</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>realapologetics@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.realapologetics.org/media/PodcastLogo.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Evidentialism Uncensored: Jim Wallace &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=301</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=301#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetic Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we look at evidence neutrally and reason our way to God as Christian apologists?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we look at evidence neutrally and reason our way to God as Christian apologists?</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=301</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcast/090711.mp3" length="36503678" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>00:01:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Should we look at evidence neutrally and reason our way to God as Christian apologists?

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Should we look at evidence neutrally and reason our way to God as Christian apologists?

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Apologetic Methodology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidentialism Uncensored: Jim Wallace &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=299</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=299#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetic Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we really approach Christian apologetics like a cold-case homocide case? Granted, there are parallels with apologetics and &#8220;making a case,&#8221; but where is our ultimate standard for how to do apologetics &#8211; God&#8217;s Word, or our experience?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we really approach Christian apologetics like a cold-case homocide case? Granted, there are parallels with apologetics and &#8220;making a case,&#8221; but where is our ultimate standard for how to do apologetics &#8211; God&#8217;s Word, or our experience?</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=299</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcast/090710.mp3" length="36002127" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>30:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Should we really approach Christian apologetics like a cold-case homocide case? Granted, there are parallels with apologetics and "making a case," but where is our ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Should we really approach Christian apologetics like a cold-case homocide case? Granted, there are parallels with apologetics and "making a case," but where is our ultimate standard for how to do apologetics - God's Word, or our experience?

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Apologetic Methodology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Refutation of Harlow on Genesis &#8211; 4</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=296</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=296#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical and Exegetical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theistic Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calvin college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Went a little long today finishing our response to Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went a little long today finishing our response to Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=296</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://realapologetics.org/podcast/080310b.mp3" length="46630302" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>38:52</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Went a little long today finishing our response to Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Went a little long today finishing our response to Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Biblical and Exegetical Studies, Theistic Evolution</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Refutation of Harlow on Genesis &#8211; 3</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=292</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=292#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical and Exegetical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theistic Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam and eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calvin college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel harlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harlow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continued from last week&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued from last week&#8230;</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=292</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcast/080310.mp3" length="36001600" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>30:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Continued from last week...

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Continued from last week...

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Biblical and Exegetical Studies, Theistic Evolution</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Refutation of Harlow on Genesis &#8211; 2</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=288</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=288#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical and Exegetical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theistic Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harlow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continued responding to the liberalism of Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued responding to the liberalism of Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=288</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://realapologetics.org/podcast/072410.mp3" length="36004213" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>30:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Continued responding to the liberalism of Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Continued responding to the liberalism of Daniel Harlow and his symbolic view of Genesis.

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Biblical and Exegetical Studies, Theistic Evolution</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Refutation of Harlow on Genesis &#8211; 1</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=283</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=283#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical and Exegetical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theistic Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam and eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old earth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Began long response to a lecture delivered by Daniel Harlow at the ASA 2009 Conference. Harlow argues that Genesis 1-11 didn&#8217;t happen (events and characters are symbolic).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Began long response to a lecture delivered by Daniel Harlow at the ASA 2009 Conference. Harlow argues that Genesis 1-11 didn&#8217;t happen (events and characters are symbolic).</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=283</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcast/072110.mp3" length="36009437" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>30:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Began long response to a lecture delivered by Daniel Harlow at the ASA 2009 Conference. Harlow argues that Genesis 1-11 didn't happen (events and characters ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Began long response to a lecture delivered by Daniel Harlow at the ASA 2009 Conference. Harlow argues that Genesis 1-11 didn't happen (events and characters are symbolic).

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Biblical and Exegetical Studies, Theistic Evolution</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Wallace, Presuppositionalism, and Hyper-Dispensationalism</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=275</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetic Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-Dispensationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidentialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[str]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Responded to the hard-line evidentialism of Jim Wallace on STR Radio and its strange parallels with Hyper-Dispensationalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responded to the hard-line evidentialism of Jim Wallace on STR Radio and its strange parallels with Hyper-Dispensationalism.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=275</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://realapologetics.org/podcast/071710.mp3" length="35993784" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>30:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Responded to the hard-line evidentialism of Jim Wallace on STR Radio and its strange parallels with Hyper-Dispensationalism.

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Responded to the hard-line evidentialism of Jim Wallace on STR Radio and its strange parallels with Hyper-Dispensationalism.

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Apologetic Methodology, Hyper-Dispensationalism</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Case For Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=272</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=272#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetic Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics and Worldview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are apologetics debates really necessary? What does the Bible teach?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are apologetics debates really necessary? What does the Bible teach?</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=272</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://realapologetics.org/podcast/071510.mp3" length="36002627" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>30:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Are apologetics debates really necessary? What does the Bible teach?

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Are apologetics debates really necessary? What does the Bible teach?

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Apologetic Methodology, Apologetics and Worldview</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debates, Baptists, and Baptisms Oh My!</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=265</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call to be pastor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[called]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant baptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pastoral calling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern baptists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discussed a variety of issues, including possible (and canceled!) debates for RealApologetics.org, the issue of &#8220;calling&#8221; in the southern baptist tradition, and infant baptism and discerning how to deal with a change of churches.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussed a variety of issues, including possible (and canceled!) debates for RealApologetics.org, the issue of &#8220;calling&#8221; in the southern baptist tradition, and infant baptism and discerning how to deal with a change of churches.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=265</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcast/071110.mp3" length="36002648" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>00:01:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Discussed a variety of issues, including possible (and canceled!) debates for RealApologetics.org, the issue of "calling" in the southern baptist tradition, and infant baptism and ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Discussed a variety of issues, including possible (and canceled!) debates for RealApologetics.org, the issue of "calling" in the southern baptist tradition, and infant baptism and discerning how to deal with a change of churches.

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Maintenance</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greg Koukl and Presuppositionalism</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=260</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=260#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 03:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetic Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acts 17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg koukl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presuppositional apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Responded to some comments by Greg Koukl (str.org) regarding presuppositional apologetics. Briefly discussed Acts 17.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responded to some comments by Greg Koukl (str.org) regarding presuppositional apologetics. Briefly discussed Acts 17.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/podcasts/?feed=rss2&amp;p=260</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.realapologetics.org/podcast/052910.mp3" length="36002648" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>00:01:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Responded to some comments by Greg Koukl (str.org) regarding presuppositional apologetics. Briefly discussed Acts 17.

 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Responded to some comments by Greg Koukl (str.org) regarding presuppositional apologetics. Briefly discussed Acts 17.

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Apologetic Methodology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Jamin Hubner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
