I don’t know why it took me about five years to get around reading Oliphint’s works. But I stumbled upon four of the best pages I’ve ever read on the subject of the relationship between theology and philosophy, and it pleases me to have one much more qualified and wise deliver timely and incredibly important [...]

One of our last criticisms of Bill Craig’s classical apologetic method contained a sound clip of him denying original sin with his debate with Shabir Ally. That was face-plant, theological-sacrifice number 1. Number 2 brings us to his response to a question on the Qu’ran. Although this is not quite as serious as denying original [...]

“As a loving God, God wants as many people as possible to be freely saved and as few as possible to be lost. His goal, then, is to achieve an optimal balance between these, to create no more of the lost than are necessary to attain a certain number of the saved. It is possible [...]

When evidential/classical apologetics is forced to deal with its faulty presuppositions, the results can often be startling. Teachings that were once easy to embrace, speak, and write about become objects of sacrifice when faced with the hard questions of skeptics. Indeed, with the wrong method, even the greatest minds crumble. Such is the case with [...]

I was re-reading one of my top 5 favorite books of all-time, which happens to be (I argue) Van Til’s most important (and less popular) work, when I came across a brief treatment of middle-knowledge. Since the subject of molinism has taken the evangelical world of apologetics by storm, it would be more than appropriate [...]

I was surprised when a friend linked me up to an apologetics podcast provided by Charles Self of Assemblies of God Theological Seminary. I know. Perhaps I should give more grace to certain branches of the institutional church and to my brothers and sisters in Christ. But my experience has been similar to the experiences [...]