I actually created my response before I saw this video of Enns. But hey, it works:

Tremper Longman III actually got it right when he called Cornelius Van Til a “philosopher.” As many of you know, Dr. Craig and Van Til’s biographer John Muether have both openly declared that “Van Til was not a philosopher,” while Dr. Anderson and John Frame of RTS have said that Van Til “is a philosopher.” [...]

A straw-man argument takes place when someone sets up a false or non-existent argument to knock-down, creating the allusion of victory, when in reality the person didn’t  knock down the real thing, but only a straw-man. In the end, all straw men arguments are failed arguments. They prove nothing. Straw-men arguments are the bread and [...]

In the last post on this series, we examined some of the hermeneutical gymnastics that the committed theistic evolutionist must perform in the text of Scripture. Now, it’s finally time to see where the serious sacrifices are made, first in general, and then specifically with the BioLogos Forum. When Darwinian evolution comprises our worldview (network [...]

In Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15, Paul draws a parallel between Jesus and Adam: Adam disobeyed (eating of the fruit) and brought death to “all”; Jesus obeyed (in his crucifixion) and (in rising) brought life to “all.” Jesus came to undo what Adam did. He came to reverse the curse of Adam. There is [...]

We continue our series on Pete Enns’ blog article “Adam is Israel” and ultimately, “Paul’s Adam”: If we see Adam as a story of Israelite origins, it will help us make sense of at least one nagging question that begins in Genesis 4:13—one that readers of Genesis, past and present, have picked up on. After [...]

“If we carefully keep this distinction in mind [the distinction set forth by Catholic theologians] and apply it in our criticism and exegesis of Scripture, it may very well happen that many parts of Scripture, which up until now we had viewed as history, prove upon study not to be history in our sense at [...]