By jaminhubner on Apr 2, 2010 in Biblical Authority and Sufficiency, Critique of "The Divine Authenticity" | Comments Off
It was a 7 post blog adventure, but we’re finished! It is my hope in this series that Christians can find confidence in the full truthfulness of the Scriptures, both in principle and in history. McGowan’s intentions seem to be genuine: let us seek balance and truth. Christians must not get over zealous of the [...]
By jaminhubner on Mar 23, 2010 in Biblical Inerrancy, Critique of "The Divine Authenticity" | Comments Off
Time to get back to McGowan… Theses Without Clarity I shall argue in this chapter that there is an older and better way to defend a ‘high’ view of Scripture: the ‘infallibilist’ view. I shall argue that this is a stronger, more sustainable and, above all, more biblical view of Scripture than the inerrantist view. [...]
By jaminhubner on Mar 19, 2010 in Biblical Inerrancy, Canon and Criticism | Comments Off
In 2004, John Brogan of Northwestern University published the essay “Can I Have Your Autographa? Uses and Abuses of Textual Criticism in Formulating an Evangelical Doctrine of Scripture” in the book Evangelicals and Scripture: Tradition, Authority, and Hermeneutics. In my opinion, Brogan’s essay is worth reading since it brings up some of the most controversial [...]
By jaminhubner on Mar 5, 2010 in Biblical Inerrancy, Critique of "The Divine Authenticity" | Comments Off
The Inerrancy of the Autographa? I refused to support the Chicago Statement of Inerrancy for a number of years because A) I hadn’t looked into it enough, and B) I didn’t understand why the inerrancy of the autographa (original manuscripts of the Bible) really mattered, since we don’t have them anyway. And, wasn’t “inerrancy” just [...]
By jaminhubner on Mar 4, 2010 in Biblical Inerrancy, Critique of "The Divine Authenticity" | Comments Off
Typical, Repetitive, Baseless Assertions We’ve already documented that it is false to assert that Kuyper, Bavinck, and Calvin did not hold to what conservative scholars would today call “the doctrine of inerrancy.” Scriptural inerrancy is not a new invention and it is not an unfair conclusion to draw given the nature, inspiration, and the truthfulness [...]
By jaminhubner on Jan 28, 2010 in Biblical Inerrancy | Comments Off
Inerrancy and The Reformed Faith of Today and Yesterday Many semi-liberal, Reformed thinkers who are anti-conservative-evangelical (i.e. Dordt College profs, Calvin College profs, Thinknet, Roy Clouser and his cronies, etc.) have often tried to separate Old Princeton’s rigorous work on the doctrine of inspiration from Neo-Calvinists’ (Bavinck and Kuyper) doctrine of Scripture. That is, they [...]