A Critique of BioLogos’ “Paul’s Adam” – 4 »

In Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15, Paul draws a parallel between Jesus and Adam: Adam disobeyed (eating of the fruit) and brought death to “all”; Jesus obeyed (in his crucifixion) and (in rising) brought life to “all.” Jesus came to undo what Adam did. He came to reverse the curse of Adam. There is [...]

A Critique of BioLogos’ “Paul’s Adam” – 3 »

We continue our series on Pete Enns’ blog article “Adam is Israel” and ultimately, “Paul’s Adam”: If we see Adam as a story of Israelite origins, it will help us make sense of at least one nagging question that begins in Genesis 4:13—one that readers of Genesis, past and present, have picked up on. After [...]

Bavinck, Enns, and the Catholics »

“If we carefully keep this distinction in mind [the distinction set forth by Catholic theologians] and apply it in our criticism and exegesis of Scripture, it may very well happen that many parts of Scripture, which up until now we had viewed as history, prove upon study not to be history in our sense at [...]

A Critique of BioLogos’ “Paul’s Adam” – 1 »

Introducing the BioLogos Forum On April 12th, Bruce Waltke submitted his RTS resignation letter to Christianity Today, which contained the following: Holy week and the Monday through Wednesday of this week have been a uniquely hectic experience in my 79 years, to say the least. So hectic, I did not even follow the New York [...]