<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RealApologetics Blog &#187; Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/category/theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog</link>
	<description>Serious. Active. God-honoring Christianity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Few Thoughts on Sudduth&#8217;s Conversion to Hinduism</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/27/a-few-thoughts-on-sudduths-conversion-to-hinduism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/27/a-few-thoughts-on-sudduths-conversion-to-hinduism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hinduism. krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oliphint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudduth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Update: Apparently I  confuse Michael Sudduth with Michael Butler. My apologies!). But anyway, most people these days know Sudduth from his recent book The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology. He&#8217;s converted to Hinduism. Read his own testimony here. Events such as these remind us of a number of things. But three are worth pointing out:  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/27/a-few-thoughts-on-sudduths-conversion-to-hinduism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel, The Promised Land, and Covenant Theology (Nichols)</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/10/israel-the-promised-land-and-covenant-theology-nichols/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/10/israel-the-promised-land-and-covenant-theology-nichols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philipcarlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical and Exegetical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-Dispensationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealApologetics Recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abrahamic Covenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covenant theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nichols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed baptist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a more dispensational past has left me quite &#8220;out of the loop&#8221; in regards to what &#8220;covenant theology&#8221; is and what it really means. The last few years of investigation have really allowed me to understand covenant theology. I have recently been working my way through Greg Nichols&#8217; &#8220;Covenant Theology: A Reformed and Baptist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/10/israel-the-promised-land-and-covenant-theology-nichols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mailbag: The Gospel and NT Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/09/mailbag-the-gospel-and-nt-wright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/09/mailbag-the-gospel-and-nt-wright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mailbag Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel primer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nt wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vincent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Real Apologetics crew, I really really like your recommendation page, it&#8217;s a safe place for me to get resources I know will help me in my walk. I do have a question though on what you would recommend on the formulation of the Gospel in confronting this trend of people like NT Wright, McKnight [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/09/mailbag-the-gospel-and-nt-wright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Use and Abuse of Sources Descredit Their Reliability or Truthfulness? &#8211; Rejoinder</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/12/22/does-the-use-and-abuse-of-sources-descredit-their-reliability-or-truthfulness-rejoinder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/12/22/does-the-use-and-abuse-of-sources-descredit-their-reliability-or-truthfulness-rejoinder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whose land]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brother Turretin has responded to the last post here. I don&#8217;t wish to prolong what seems to many a fruitless back-and-forth. But a few words ought to go on the record for the sake of clarity, and I will try to do so without repeating Tur&#8217;s condescending tone (&#8220;Maybe Hubner needs to Look Up &#8216;Shill&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/12/22/does-the-use-and-abuse-of-sources-descredit-their-reliability-or-truthfulness-rejoinder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Thanks!</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/24/give-thanks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/24/give-thanks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thanksgiving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy thanksgiving! A Savior, a gracious God, a certain way of salvation and hope for tomorrow. The holiday is nothing but soft sentiments or a purely historical reflection for those who do not honor Christ as Lord. But for the Christian, our thanks goes beyond our own efforts and beyond chance events. It is truly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/24/give-thanks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government and Church (Frame)</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/19/government-and-church-frame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/19/government-and-church-frame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctrine of christian life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john frame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laws like the ADA cannot succeed in creating ultimate equality. They give special help to many who don&#8217;t need it and penalize people who, considered on an objective basis, do need help. This is, of course, the nature of government. It cannot make fine distinctions among individuals to determine who truly needs help and who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/19/government-and-church-frame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Creator-Creature Distinction and the Incarnation</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/04/the-creator-creature-distinction-and-the-incarnation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/04/the-creator-creature-distinction-and-the-incarnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incarnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the leading Christian historians alive today (many of his works are well-worth reading) made an interesting assertion in an interview with Christianity Today (August 2011) about his new book Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind: The great relevance of the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian definition is to affirm that Jesus Christ was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2011/11/04/the-creator-creature-distinction-and-the-incarnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

