Category: Critique of BioLogos

Bavinck, Enns, and the Catholics »

“If we carefully keep this distinction in mind [the distinction set forth by Catholic theologians] and apply it in our criticism and exegesis of Scripture, it may very well happen that many parts of Scripture, which up until now we had viewed as history, prove upon study not to be history in our sense at [...]

A Critique of Biologos’ “Paul’s Adam” – 2 »

Adam is What? Maybe Israel’s history happened first, and the Adam story was written to reflect that history. In other words, the Adam story is really an Israel story placed in primeval time. It is not a story of human origins but of Israel’s origins. Peter Enns said this about Genesis on March 2 in [...]

A Critique of BioLogos’ “Paul’s Adam” – 1 »

Introducing the BioLogos Forum On April 12th, Bruce Waltke submitted his RTS resignation letter to Christianity Today, which contained the following: Holy week and the Monday through Wednesday of this week have been a uniquely hectic experience in my 79 years, to say the least. So hectic, I did not even follow the New York [...]