<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RealApologetics Blog &#187; Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/category/christian-neurophilosophy/neurophilosophy-consciousness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog</link>
	<description>Serious. Active. God-honoring Christianity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Christian Response to the 2010 &#8220;Consensus Statement&#8221; on Morality &#8211; Part III</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/28/a-christian-response-to-the-2010-consensus-statement-on-morality-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/28/a-christian-response-to-the-2010-consensus-statement-on-morality-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critique of The Consensus Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics, Law, and Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consensus statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurotheology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theological anthropology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=2055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we move to the 5th point of the 2010 Consensus Statement on morality, we once again realize how important a biblical neurotheology really is: 5) Moral judgments and values are often at odds with actual behavior People often fail to live up to their consciously-endorsed values. One of the many reasons for the disconnect [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/28/a-christian-response-to-the-2010-consensus-statement-on-morality-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Christian Response to the 2010 “Consensus Statement” on Morality – Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/23/a-christian-response-to-the-2010-%e2%80%9cconsensus-statement%e2%80%9d-on-morality-%e2%80%93-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/23/a-christian-response-to-the-2010-%e2%80%9cconsensus-statement%e2%80%9d-on-morality-%e2%80%93-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critique of The Consensus Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics, Law, and Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consensus statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurophilosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurotheology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=2030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Eight Commandments of Atheistic Ethics (better known as the 8 points of the 2010 Consensus Statement on morality) begins with the following: 1) Morality is a natural phenomenon and a cultural phenomenon Like language, sexuality, or music, morality emerges from the interaction of multiple psychological building blocks within each person, and from the interactions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/23/a-christian-response-to-the-2010-%e2%80%9cconsensus-statement%e2%80%9d-on-morality-%e2%80%93-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Christian Response to &#8220;The New Science of Morality&#8221; &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/02/a-christian-response-to-the-new-science-of-morality-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/02/a-christian-response-to-the-new-science-of-morality-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critique of "New Science of Morality"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurophilosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=1937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam Harris, author of The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values (forthcoming) continues describing &#8220;the New Science of Morality&#8221; in Edge 325: And yet, on the subject of morality, we seem to think that the possibility of differing opinions, the fact that someone can come forward and say that his morality has nothing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/09/02/a-christian-response-to-the-new-science-of-morality-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Surrogates&#8221; and its Bioethical Implications</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/01/19/surrogates-and-its-bioethical-implications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/01/19/surrogates-and-its-bioethical-implications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Neurophilosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind-body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind/body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurophilosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out of body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrogates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the mind body problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other night I finally watched Surrogates (2009)  starring Bruce Willis. The story takes place several decades in the future and essentially portrays 21st century society as a giant &#8220;grid&#8221; of humanoid robots that take the place of natural human bodies. Through the advances of neuroscience, the human mind can control machines, and through more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2010/01/19/surrogates-and-its-bioethical-implications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mind-Control Take 2: Christian Apologetics and Ontological Relativism</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2009/10/15/mind-control-take-2-christian-apologetics-and-ontological-relativism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2009/10/15/mind-control-take-2-christian-apologetics-and-ontological-relativism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind-control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurophilosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontological relativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relativism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Oct. 16, 2009) — By directly manipulating the activity of individual neurons, scientists have given flies memories of a bad experience they never really had, according to a report in the October 16th issue of the journal Cell, a Cell Press publication. Before looking at this subject a little more, perhaps I should remind readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2009/10/15/mind-control-take-2-christian-apologetics-and-ontological-relativism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Remote Controlled Beetle (Soon to be Human?) and God&#8217;s Holiness</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2009/09/23/the-remote-controlled-beetle-soon-to-be-human-and-gods-holiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2009/09/23/the-remote-controlled-beetle-soon-to-be-human-and-gods-holiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neurological Anthropology: The Mind-Body Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurophilosophy: Consciousness, Cognition, and Self-ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douglas groothuis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epilepsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hirotaka Sato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiness of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julien Offroy de la Mettrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind-control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montreal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilder penfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with neurology is to understand man himself. - Wilder Penfield Concurrent with the last post on mind-control, it was recently announced that scientists successfully created the first-ever, remote controlled and accurate-flying beetle. That&#8217;s right, Hirotaka Sato at the University of Berkeley, wired up and attached a chip to the beetle&#8217;s body that sends [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2009/09/23/the-remote-controlled-beetle-soon-to-be-human-and-gods-holiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

