<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RealApologetics Blog &#187; jaminhubner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/author/jaminhubner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog</link>
	<description>Serious. Active. God-honoring Christianity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Grudem&#8217;s Book on Politics, and Other Meditations</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/02/01/grudems-book-on-politics-and-other-meditations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/02/01/grudems-book-on-politics-and-other-meditations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics, Law, and Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grudem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics according to the bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First is Grudem&#8217;s book Politics According to the Bible. I&#8217;ve been going through it lately and wanted to share some brief thoughts. I&#8217;ll start with a few obvious criticisms: (1) Poor editorial work for a generally good book (the recent Politics According to the Bible by Grudem). Did someone say, &#8220;spellcheck&#8221;? The &#8220;Untied States&#8221; (instead [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/02/01/grudems-book-on-politics-and-other-meditations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Few Thoughts on Sudduth&#8217;s Conversion to Hinduism</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/27/a-few-thoughts-on-sudduths-conversion-to-hinduism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/27/a-few-thoughts-on-sudduths-conversion-to-hinduism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hinduism. krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oliphint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudduth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Update: Apparently I  confuse Michael Sudduth with Michael Butler. My apologies!). But anyway, most people these days know Sudduth from his recent book The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology. He&#8217;s converted to Hinduism. Read his own testimony here. Events such as these remind us of a number of things. But three are worth pointing out:  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/27/a-few-thoughts-on-sudduths-conversion-to-hinduism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silence in the Churches: Expositing 1 Corinthians 14:34</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/20/silence-in-the-churches-expositing-1-corinthians-1434/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/20/silence-in-the-churches-expositing-1-corinthians-1434/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14:34]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What then, brothers? When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation. Let all things be done for building up. If any speak in a tongue, let there be only two or at most three, and each in turn, and let someone interpret. But if there [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/20/silence-in-the-churches-expositing-1-corinthians-1434/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Fun Video to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/16/a-fun-video-to-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/16/a-fun-video-to-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetic Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bahnsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presuppositional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/16/a-fun-video-to-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Laws of Logic and Reformed Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/11/the-laws-of-logic-and-reformed-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/11/the-laws-of-logic-and-reformed-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bahnsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws of logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The laws of logic have played a consistent role in Reformed apologetics in the past century. Figures such as Van Til and Bahnsen have often appealed to the nature of logical laws to form a transcendental argument for the existence of God. But there are still critical questions about the nature of these laws that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/11/the-laws-of-logic-and-reformed-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mailbag: The Gospel and NT Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/09/mailbag-the-gospel-and-nt-wright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/09/mailbag-the-gospel-and-nt-wright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mailbag Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel primer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nt wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vincent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Real Apologetics crew, I really really like your recommendation page, it&#8217;s a safe place for me to get resources I know will help me in my walk. I do have a question though on what you would recommend on the formulation of the Gospel in confronting this trend of people like NT Wright, McKnight [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/09/mailbag-the-gospel-and-nt-wright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At Least One Paedobaptist Concession on Colossians 2</title>
		<link>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/02/at-least-one-paedobaptist-concession-on-colossians-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/02/at-least-one-paedobaptist-concession-on-colossians-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaminhubner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circumcision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colossians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/?p=4155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colossians 2:11-14 has been used by paedobaptists for centuries to establish the vital connection between OT circumcision and NT baptism. Richard Barcellos, “An Exegetical Appraisal of Colossians 2:11-12.” Reformed Baptist Theological Review 2 (2005): 5, and Martin Salter’s essay, “Does Baptism Replace Circumcision? An Examination of the Relationship between Circumcision and Baptism in Colossians 2:11-12.” [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realapologetics.org/blog/2012/01/02/at-least-one-paedobaptist-concession-on-colossians-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

