Changes in the King James Bible

Ran into a couple seminary/church “King James Only” people again. It’s just…sad. What real basis do we have, except sheer gut-feeling, for believing that one particular English translation is the inspired Word of God?

Then, on a totally different occasion about three days later, I ran into a decent article by accident called “Errors in the King James Bible?” by William Combs from a 1999 issue of the Detroit Baptist Seminary Journal. I was happy to see that he cited from White’s The King James Only Controversy, which is without a doubt the foremost book on the subject. Whatever the case, he lists in chart form the (rather substantial) changes from the 1611 (“Authorized Version”) King James Version to the Modern King James Version, and I thought it would be helpful to post: